Ethical Issues in Health Information Management

Ethical Issues in Health Information Management 

 

Ethical Issues

Preface 

When considering any problematic situation in life, one must first look at what the results are from a moral viewpoint. numerous scholars believe that the answer to any problem can be humane and that chancing it's commodity that every person who encounters difficulties in their life should strive for. occasionally there are moments in life the way out of which is insolvable without a moral dilemma and immolation on one side or the other. still, it's worth understanding that similar situations are rare, and modesty in making a decision should be at the head of any of the styles of working the problem. This aspect is essential to consider if a person’s life or health is at stake. It's hard to imagine the moral choices that are occasionally disregarded by both medical labor force and sanitarium directors. One similar illustration will be bandied in this paper. 

 

Discussion 

Considering the data, which are given in the condition of the problem, also, first of all, it's demanded to pay attention to the poor fiscal situation of the sanitarium. This aspect is critical because backing is one of the most important aspects of the sanitarium’s living conditions, along with the moxie of the medical staff and innovative treatment styles. Each of these factors is interrelated and can not live without the forenamed conditions being met( Moskop, 2017). Backing is the abecedarian factor on which all the others depend because staff reclamation and outfit renewal can only be achieved through profitable fiscal investments. 

 

Talking about the specific illustration of the problem, it has two particular results, which depend on how far- observed the person is. On the one hand, it's possible to use the further immoral option, which can bring in further plutocrat and, as a result, ameliorate patient care in the future. On the other hand, one can make a decision that's grounded on the moral then and now, thereby not breaking the law at the cost of lower backing( Smith etal., 2017). Each person must decide for themselves which of the choices is more correct and which will be of further benefit. 

 

Making one decision or another depends not only on the individual but also on the problem at hand and the situation in which one finds oneself. frequently the choices to be made are more complex and confusing because opinions must be viewed from a deeper perspective( Smith etal., 2017). It's also essential to be guided by some way, thanks to which it's possible to make an algorithm of conduct and prognosticate the result of the problem situation( Mcway, 2014). The first option is preferable, as it'll help save further lives in the future. Indeed though it's more delicate to perform and not all people will be suitable to accept it, the result of conduct will be conspicuous shortly. 

 

First of all, it's necessary to dissect the issue at hand because if careful planning is done, the result may feel more pronounced. After that, it's essential to pay attention to the small details that produce the problem. frequently one can see that external factors can be more severe than the issue being raised and have the answer in themselves( Moskop, 2017). The coming step is to work as a platoon because this removes the subjectivity of the decision and allows the problem to be viewed from different angles and told by the opinions of others. It's essential to understand that this step requires the presence of people competent in the matter, who, grounded on the data attained, will be suitable to formulate the correct conclusion. posterior way will be directed only to the relinquishment of a rational way out of the situation grounded on the system of induction. 

 

The medical field must, first of all, be guided by the morality of the decision. This is due in large part to the fact that it's a matter of people’s lives and what can help to cover them. It's worth understanding that any decision made within the walls of a medical institution incontinently becomes public knowledge, which may also differ with the results( Hammaker etal., 2017). This brings reputational pitfalls and reduces the occasion for a correct decision in the future. 

 

The director brings to the work their riches and address. Individual requirements, lineage, and religious beliefs – all these factors form the director’s system of values. When making immorally correct opinions, a director is guided primarily by specific particular characteristics, similar as confidence in their forces and a advanced sense of independence. 

 

One of the most important particular characteristics of the director is the stage of his moral development. At the position of the former development, people are interested first of all in external palms( and discipline). The trouble of negative consequences in the event of defiance is the base for the connection of power. In organizational terms, this stage is characterized by directors who use authoritarian or primitive leadership styles, as well as directors who concentrate on guarantees that specific tasks will be performed( Hébert & Rosen, 2020). The stylish way to achieve the pretensions is to work together in groups. The most applicable leadership style is one that encourages commerce and cooperation. 

 

At the stage of the coming, or principle- grounded, development, people are guided primarily by natural values and morals, in numerous cases ignoring the rules and laws that bear violation of these morals. natural values come more important than indeed rigorously external bones

At this superior position of development, directors use transformational or service leadership styles. Attention is concentrated on the requirements of followers and stimulation of others to tone- determined thinking and result of problems that arise from the principles of morality( Hammaker etal., 2017). This position is characterized by the power of power when the workers gain the right of formative participation in the operation of the association.